I know you're looking for pics from around da hood of the members here but I gotta point you to one hilarious site - www.ricecop.comXerxes said:
I think this is in the same general spirit of what you're after... :lol:
I know you're looking for pics from around da hood of the members here but I gotta point you to one hilarious site - www.ricecop.comXerxes said:I think it'd be cool to post pics of cars that bring shame to the sportscar/tuner world. You know the ones. The POS with bad paint, stock wheels, completely stock engine, a big wing, and a shitty muffler...and the guy acts like he's driving a Viper.
Aries/Reliant 81-89. Maybe its something else if you are sure that it is from the 70's. There are a whole slew of those riced out on www.cardomain.com and www.sounddomain.com. Of course owning one myself I feel I have to share a few extra things concerning this car, It makes a excellent sleeperXerxes said:My inspiration...
I saw something like a mid-late seventies Dodge Aeries (or something close), like the good old undercover-cop-mobile...all stock. Ugly as sin. Stock exhaust, probably stock engine, stock wheels...and a huge IMPORT wing. Seriously, it was like straight out of the Honda Civic section of the aftermarket catalog. I damn near fell over laughing in the parking lot.
AWD OWNZ U said:
While I can't comment on the paint, it's got stock rims, stock engine, a big wing, doesn't even have mufflers and I can bet you most people driving one will act like they have a Viper. Just going by your criteria here...Xerxes said:I think it'd be cool to post pics of cars that bring shame to the sportscar/tuner world. You know the ones. The POS with bad paint, stock wheels, completely stock engine, a big wing, and a shitty muffler...and the guy acts like he's driving a Viper.
Hahaha, touché. Actually, the mail reason why I prefer the SRT to the 2003 WRX is because of the look.drizze99 said:OK, here's a real looker. Talk about an ugly stock car.....
![]()
Yea, I wish Dodge would have wised up with the bug eyes. I really can't stand them, oh well. I really don't think we're going to see that many "rice" SRT-4's because of its limited availability. Then again, you never know. All I think I'm going to do is lower its overall stance and get 17" gunmetal racing wheels. (exterior looks) Engine mods are a different story, I'm definitely starting with an LSD, and then go from there.Slow5OH said:Subaru wised up and got rid of the bug eyes, IMO the 2002-2003 WRX's aren't very good looking but they more than make up for it in the performance department. The 2004's look much better than the current WRX or the SRT, again IMO. I wouldn't exactly call the SRT rice, not yet anyway, although the big wing on the back is somewhat questionable. Rice is a somewhat subjective term but it is generally described as looking fast without being fast. Being that the SRT is somewhat fast it's not rice, not yet. However I am sure in a couple of months we'll being seeing roll cages, harnasses and racing seats in otherwise stock SRT-4's, and that my friends is rice.
-Faast
I think the WRXs are quite good looking, but that's beside the point. Quite a few drivers of some what fast affordable cars like the WRX or SRT-4s always think they are gods gift to driving. In that way both cars bring shame to the tuner world.drizze99 said:OK, here's a real looker. Talk about an ugly stock car.....
![]()
Funny you say that, obviously I frequent NASIOC (Subaru Board) a lot. Over there from time to time we get these conspiracy theory freaks who will register and then as their first thread they'll start spouting off about how 9-11 was all the government's fault and how charges, not airplanes, brought down the towers. All totally ridiculous. Anyway someone posted this on NASIOC today as a joke, props to MightyWRX02.lifeisdeath said:ok, did you guys know that th u.s. government is behind the 9-11 "attack". they orchestrated the whole event. i have proof too... i saw it on nazi oc.