Cost effective in the short term might go to the S2 but only if it includes 3bar sensors. In the long term, though the DSP will be the over all winner.
The spit and sputter are definately the 625 + SAFC but the S2 won't do a whole lot to improve that, yet the DSP can get your injectors programmed into your PCM and completely eliminate it.
The biggest advantages the Dsp gives you is choice.
You can decide to add 3 bar sensors or just keep the boost under 20psi. Its your choice.
Even if you didn't tune with it, the DSP's comprehensive datalogger gives you infinately more information to evaluate your tune and improve it. Logging Knock, RPM, TPS, Timing, ect really opens your eyes to the "quality" of your tune. Often once you've seen a log, a tune you've once thought was great, really stinks. Whether you fine tune the 93tune, stock tune, or pay for a custom tune, its your choice.
__________________
"Just because someone goes fast doesn't mean you should do whatever you think they did.
This path assumes they knew what they were doing, which isn't necessarily the case"..........RB Racing
Last edited by duster360 : 10-05-2009 at 08:04 PM.
|
Need help best cost effective route to go???
Linear Mode
