Stage 3 ef1+ e85 dyno

[Zenkat]

The only thing that confuses me is that S3 should be spiking way more torque than HP. 430/390? That's straight up backwards.

390/430 would be so incredibly believable, especially on 19psi. And would account for the trapspeed as well.

*shrug*

[D-SRT]

Quote: Originally Posted by underSRTarmor

Look man. Don't get wrapped up with numbers. This is the reason I haven dynoed.

Cano dyno 540 trapped 132
Zenkat dyno 450ish trap 131.xx

See my point? Don't get wrapped up. We had this same argument with the BWS. People want to see times if times don't match with dyno then something dont add up.


Autoguide.com App

And I bet those 2 dyno sheets look like they came from 2 totally different car models.

Cano is running a turbo that is super old designed (60-1 with stg5 turbine wheel). Mainly stock parts. Probably a not so pretty powerband.
Zenkat...just from a post or 2 that I've seen, he's a BW s3? Wide tq and powerband given.
Lots of factors for why they trap close to the same with a hp variance.

Anyway, you can't dick around dynojet numbers fellas. Folks love to call BS on dyno's, but it is what it is on a dynojet. You can't change CF's aside from doing SAE, STD, Uncorrected.
Plus, MAP has never been one to throw around fake dyno numbers.

Only reason a DJ would be off is they are using SAE or STD in a HIGH ELEVATION situation (when it should be uncorrected), in which that case the numbers would be over inflated for sure...Many many times I've seen guys from Colorado and New Mexico throw crazy numbers out (on here and on other various forums), and that's why. i don't think MAP is in a high elevation location anyway.

Mustang Dynos, Dynapaks...different story.


Nothing really abnormal about a big wheel running 430/390 either. unported mani/stock 02...19psi isn't much preload on the wg (thus not much of a hard hit/high tq compared to a stiff preload). big wheel (what size are those ef's anyway). who knows how much timing is at peak torque? Could be low, and adding 2-3* could change everything.

[underSRTarmor]

I'm sure they both rev to 6500-6750

Thing is cano should making powder all the way to 6500 then shifting it will fall back at 4500 still in boost should pull

Zenkat is peaking out at 6k from the dyno sheet so if he shifts there it will put him at ~4000 so 3rd and 4th they are still both in power band. With 90 hp difference. Peak numbers I wanna see cano dyno graph.

[D-SRT]

Not trying to argue with ya (i been doing that a lot with others lately it seems, lol).
Just wanted to state that dynojet numbers are the industry standard largely because the numbers can't be messed with like MD's, dynapaks, dynacoms, etc. So it translates to numbers that can be pretty reliable across the board (again, unless STD/SAE is used for high elevation cars...then you'll have way inflated #s).

[underSRTarmor]

Quote: Originally Posted by D-SRT

Not trying to argue with ya (i been doing that a lot with others lately it seems, lol).
Just wanted to state that dynojet numbers are the industry standard largely because the numbers can't be messed with like MD's, dynapaks, dynacoms, etc. So it translates to numbers that can be pretty reliable across the board (again, unless STD/SAE is used for high elevation cars...then you'll have way inflated #s).

not argueing with you man. its all good,

[Zenkat]

Well, the track's lied to me before. I've been trying to hunt down others' timeslips to compare my numbers and see how legit it seems. I had 2 passes, nearly identical, both trapping 115 at the 1000', but one was 131, and the other was 127. I cant tell if its a glitch, if i let off right at the line and skewed the infrared, or what.

I hit 130+ on 4 passes before i suddenly started doing 127-128.

[Turbolag87]

Quote: Originally Posted by Zenkat

Well, the track's lied to me before. I've been trying to hunt down others' timeslips to compare my numbers and see how legit it seems. I had 2 passes, nearly identical, both trapping 115 at the 1000', but one was 131, and the other was 127. I cant tell if its a glitch, if i let off right at the line and skewed the infrared, or what.

I hit 130+ on 4 passes before i suddenly started doing 127-128.

what turbo u running again?

[Zenkat]

Quote: Originally Posted by turbolag87

what turbo u running again?

ef1..

[jay05acr]

Zenkat you're car is very impressive

[Zenkat]

Quote: Originally Posted by jay05acr

Zenkat you're car is very impressive

She's about fed up, though. The engine and axles need rebuilds

On a subject change, i'm truly amazed that Duster's injectors are not completely maxed out by now. I checked one of my logs and i found a max IDC of 82%. These 888's go a long way with a bosch044 and a return line, on e85.

[underSRTarmor]

Quote: Originally Posted by Zenkat

She's about fed up, though. The engine and axles need rebuilds

On a subject change, i'm truly amazed that Duster's injectors are not completely maxed out by now. I checked one of my logs and i found a max IDC of 82%. These 888's go a long way with a bosch044 and a return line, on e85.

What base fp?

[Zenkat]

Quote: Originally Posted by underSRTarmor

What base fp?

58 base, vac/boost sourced.

[s ar tee 4]

Quote: Originally Posted by Zenkat

The only thing that confuses me is that S3 should be spiking way more torque than HP. 430/390? That's straight up backwards.

390/430 would be so incredibly believable, especially on 19psi. And would account for the trapspeed as well.

*shrug*

^^ this is what I thought when I first saw it. But like I said, I still think its my transmission issues that's holding me back.

[s ar tee 4]

Quote: Originally Posted by D-SRT

And I bet those 2 dyno sheets look like they came from 2 totally different car models.

Cano is running a turbo that is super old designed (60-1 with stg5 turbine wheel). Mainly stock parts. Probably a not so pretty powerband.
Zenkat...just from a post or 2 that I've seen, he's a BW s3? Wide tq and powerband given.
Lots of factors for why they trap close to the same with a hp variance.

Anyway, you can't dick around dynojet numbers fellas. Folks love to call BS on dyno's, but it is what it is on a dynojet. You can't change CF's aside from doing SAE, STD, Uncorrected.
Plus, MAP has never been one to throw around fake dyno numbers.

Only reason a DJ would be off is they are using SAE or STD in a HIGH ELEVATION situation (when it should be uncorrected), in which that case the numbers would be over inflated for sure...Many many times I've seen guys from Colorado and New Mexico throw crazy numbers out (on here and on other various forums), and that's why. i don't think MAP is in a high elevation location anyway.

Mustang Dynos, Dynapaks...different story.


Nothing really abnormal about a big wheel running 430/390 either. unported mani/stock 02...19psi isn't much preload on the wg (thus not much of a hard hit/high tq compared to a stiff preload). big wheel (what size are those ef's anyway). who knows how much timing is at peak torque? Could be low, and adding 2-3* could change everything.

Correct on the wastegate. Little to no preload on the stock s3 wastegate.

[93stang434]

Quote: Originally Posted by D-SRT

And I bet those 2 dyno sheets look like they came from 2 totally different car models.

Cano is running a turbo that is super old designed (60-1 with stg5 turbine wheel). Mainly stock parts. Probably a not so pretty powerband.
Zenkat...just from a post or 2 that I've seen, he's a BW s3? Wide tq and powerband given.
Lots of factors for why they trap close to the same with a hp variance.

Anyway, you can't dick around dynojet numbers fellas. Folks love to call BS on dyno's, but it is what it is on a dynojet. You can't change CF's aside from doing SAE, STD, Uncorrected.
Plus, MAP has never been one to throw around fake dyno numbers.

Only reason a DJ would be off is they are using SAE or STD in a HIGH ELEVATION situation (when it should be uncorrected), in which that case the numbers would be over inflated for sure...Many many times I've seen guys from Colorado and New Mexico throw crazy numbers out (on here and on other various forums), and that's why. i don't think MAP is in a high elevation location anyway.

Mustang Dynos, Dynapaks...different story.


Nothing really abnormal about a big wheel running 430/390 either. unported mani/stock 02...19psi isn't much preload on the wg (thus not much of a hard hit/high tq compared to a stiff preload). big wheel (what size are those ef's anyway). who knows how much timing is at peak torque? Could be low, and adding 2-3* could change everything.

You make it sound like the differences between STD and SAE isn't a big deal and it is a big deal.Dynojets set on standard correction always read high(CEO of Dynojet warns of this) and why some dyno shops use STD get the numbers they want.Look at the dyno sheet for this big wheel s3 and guess what STD.Even the CEO of dynojet agrees that a load bearing dyno like a MD or a load bearing DJ is better for tuning if you want numbers use a eddy current DJ,you want really good numbers use STD correction.