Go Back   SRT Forums - SRT4, SRT6, SRT8, SRT10 & Dodge Forum > SRT-4 Other Discussion > SRT Videos
Register Home Forum Photo Gallery Active Topics (D) Chat VBay [0] Mark Forums Read

       
SRTForums.com is the premier Dodge Neon SRT-4 on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2007, 07:01 PM   #46 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Member Number: 12912
Location: houston, tx
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 291
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by GAngel
A modified stg3 trapping in low to mid 120's vs a stock turbo i trapping 110-112?

Why would you even bother racing...We already know you'd win even if you missed every gear.

with the mods listed on that evo if its running around 20psi its making OVER 300awhp, so i can guarantee its trapping more around 115+ maybe even 118ish.
Apx_632 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 08-31-2007, 08:07 PM   #47 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
dsmfan95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member Number: 529
Location: North Carolina
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,547
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by andrewsboots
Quote: Originally Posted by dsmfan95
Quote: Originally Posted by andrewsboots
Quote: Originally Posted by Phoenyx
Nice way to beat on the lowly powered EVOs..

Try running something more your speed - like a GT35R EVO with cams, meth, etc.. I seriously doubt you'd fly past him from a dig..

-M

^^ thanks captain obvious.

anyway,
Stage 3 turbo is not a BIG turbo. Anyone else see it this way?

It isn't a big turbo, but that's what I would have gotten if I had kept my SRT-4. The powerband is very appealing.

It's not a big turbo, but it's still bigger than a stock Evo

Are you sure? I'll bet you one dollar that the evo 9 turbo is bigger than a stage 3.

Bigger meaning it flows more punds per minute.

What's the flow on a stock wheeled stage 3 with cams? Most bolt-on Evo9's won't clear 40lbs/min. Cammed ones with race gas usually peak out around 43lbs/min. They won't flow as much as a Stage 3 with an upgraded wheel. This is using a pocketlogger. Are there any Stage3's that have logged theirs or can you log SRT-4s like that?

I'm not going based on ratings because I think the Evo9 is rated low, those are peak flow numbers from what I've seen on the forums.
__________________
2005 Evo VIII
dsmfan95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 09:27 PM   #48 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
njshift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Member Number: 5417
Location: nj
Trader Rating: (14)
Posts: 1,851
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by Phoenyx
The arguments about the cost of an SRT4 compared to an EVO/STI is just retarded (as stated earlier). You can't add the purchase price of a car to the overall cost of making a car fast ... assine! We all have different budgets and most SRT4 owners on these boards, if purchase price was identical, would get the EVO/STI in a heartbeat...

-M

There's no right or wrong to an opinion, there's only those who don't want to hear what others have to say. I don't see anything wrong with adding the total amount of money invested into a car. You may think otherwise, that's cool. Just don't tell someone that their opinion is asinine because you think you're opinion is far better. That turns a simple discussion into a retarded argument.

The replacement car hard-on changes like the wind around here. One month its an EVO, the next it's an STI, after that it's a G35, last month it was the Cobra. This is not unusual with a car of this nature and the average age of owners on this site.
__________________
njshift is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 09:49 PM   #49 (permalink)
SRToc Member
 
fusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Member Number: 3617
Location: Burbank, CA
Trader Rating: (5)
Posts: 2,788
Default

Well I see plenty of S2 vs Evo 9 races and nobody complains about the fact that the Evo 9's turbo flows way more than a stock turbo cert. Peeps can't just post vids anymore cause of crybabies.
__________________
SRToc Member #209
Patrick Willis wha?!
fusion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 10:15 PM   #50 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
Phoenyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member Number: 421
Location: Plano, TX
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 737
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by njshift
Quote: Originally Posted by Phoenyx
The arguments about the cost of an SRT4 compared to an EVO/STI is just retarded (as stated earlier). You can't add the purchase price of a car to the overall cost of making a car fast ... assine! We all have different budgets and most SRT4 owners on these boards, if purchase price was identical, would get the EVO/STI in a heartbeat...

-M

There's no right or wrong to an opinion, there's only those who don't want to hear what others have to say. I don't see anything wrong with adding the total amount of money invested into a car. You may think otherwise, that's cool. Just don't tell someone that their opinion is asinine because you think you're opinion is far better. That turns a simple discussion into a retarded argument.

I never stated that my opinion is far better so how do you know what I was thinking? I am just using simple logic. People have many budgets. Is the next door neighbor wasting money because he bought a SL65 AMG that got took at the track by a modded SRT4? That's the argument here and I think it's a ridiculous argument just to prove that someone paid less money to get a faster car.

-M
__________________

EVO VIII: 351awhp/354awtq on 91oct @ 25psi spike down to 21psi
Phoenyx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2007, 04:02 AM   #51 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
Corey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Member Number: 862
Location: Jeffersonville
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 191
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by Apx_632
Quote: Originally Posted by GAngel
A modified stg3 trapping in low to mid 120's vs a stock turbo i trapping 110-112?

Why would you even bother racing...We already know you'd win even if you missed every gear.

with the mods listed on that evo if its running around 20psi its making OVER 300awhp, so i can guarantee its trapping more around 115+ maybe even 118ish.



I honestly don't think a Evo 9 with the mods of the one in the vid is going 115+ mph in the 1/4. Well....at least not on straight 93 oct pump gas.

The Evo 9 turbo isn't any bigger than the 8's besides the compressor housing. The turbine wheel is still a 16G and I don't think it flows 47lbs/min. Like I said in a earlier post, this would be a better vid/race if the OP was on straight pump without meth or if the Evo was running higher boost on some race gas.

Its clear a lighter car with more mods and power is gonna win over a heavier car with less mods and power.
__________________
2006 Graphite Gray Evo 9 SE
Corey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2007, 10:29 AM   #52 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
njshift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Member Number: 5417
Location: nj
Trader Rating: (14)
Posts: 1,851
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by Phoenyx
Quote: Originally Posted by njshift
Quote: Originally Posted by Phoenyx
The arguments about the cost of an SRT4 compared to an EVO/STI is just retarded (as stated earlier). You can't add the purchase price of a car to the overall cost of making a car fast ... assine! We all have different budgets and most SRT4 owners on these boards, if purchase price was identical, would get the EVO/STI in a heartbeat...

-M

There's no right or wrong to an opinion, there's only those who don't want to hear what others have to say. I don't see anything wrong with adding the total amount of money invested into a car. You may think otherwise, that's cool. Just don't tell someone that their opinion is asinine because you think you're opinion is far better. That turns a simple discussion into a retarded argument.

I never stated that my opinion is far better so how do you know what I was thinking? I am just using simple logic. People have many budgets. Is the next door neighbor wasting money because he bought a SL65 AMG that got took at the track by a modded SRT4? That's the argument here and I think it's a ridiculous argument just to prove that someone paid less money to get a faster car.

-M

M, do you remember commenting that my particular beliefs are "assine" (I'm assuming you meant asinine)......... Logic would tell me that it sure seems you don't like what I have to say otherwise you wouldn't have attempted to make a negative comment. So to surmise, you make a negative comment about my opinion then you continue to reiterate your beliefs =you think your opinion is better. Come on man, that's just common sense, I don't need to be inside your head to figure that out.
Quote: Originally Posted by Phoenyx
You can't add the purchase price of a car to the overall cost of making a car fast ... assine!

Like I said before, the only reason why I mentioned the price of the srt-4 is to stir up the pot. It’s really not that important. I say all this because I find it funny that you complain that the srt-4 has more money put into its mods. When comparing two completely different vehicles it shouldn’t make a difference if one person spent slightly more money modifying their car. That is why I made the comment about price, just to bring up the fact that we’re talking about two different vehicles. If you’re going to sit there and tell me the srt-4 has more money dropped into its modifications I’m going to tell you that the more expensive EVO has a more potent stock power plant. The EVO IX does not need to spend the same amount of money to achieve the same amount of power. These are two different vehicles, the mod for mod comparison does not apply here especially when racing from a dig.
njshift is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2007, 11:33 AM   #53 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
andrewsboots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Member Number: 45507
Location: Oklahoma
Trader Rating: (39)
Posts: 845
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by dsmfan95
Quote: Originally Posted by andrewsboots
Quote: Originally Posted by dsmfan95
Quote: Originally Posted by andrewsboots
Quote: Originally Posted by Phoenyx
Nice way to beat on the lowly powered EVOs..

Try running something more your speed - like a GT35R EVO with cams, meth, etc.. I seriously doubt you'd fly past him from a dig..

-M

^^ thanks captain obvious.

anyway,
Stage 3 turbo is not a BIG turbo. Anyone else see it this way?

It isn't a big turbo, but that's what I would have gotten if I had kept my SRT-4. The powerband is very appealing.

It's not a big turbo, but it's still bigger than a stock Evo

Are you sure? I'll bet you one dollar that the evo 9 turbo is bigger than a stage 3.

Bigger meaning it flows more punds per minute.

What's the flow on a stock wheeled stage 3 with cams? Most bolt-on Evo9's won't clear 40lbs/min. Cammed ones with race gas usually peak out around 43lbs/min. They won't flow as much as a Stage 3 with an upgraded wheel. This is using a pocketlogger. Are there any Stage3's that have logged theirs or can you log SRT-4s like that?

I'm not going based on ratings because I think the Evo9 is rated low, those are peak flow numbers from what I've seen on the forums.

I have not flow tested a stage 3. Just going off of the turbine and compressor housing + wheel. I'm not sure what size turbine wheel the stage 3 has. but the evo nine compressor housing is bigger than stage 3.
andrewsboots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2007, 01:11 PM   #54 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Member Number: 56989
Location: az
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 3
Default

looks like he smoked you off line (with a bad start ) and then let off the gas you can hear it
turbomonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2007, 02:04 PM   #55 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
Phoenyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member Number: 421
Location: Plano, TX
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 737
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by njshift
So to surmise, you make a negative comment about my opinion then you continue to reiterate your beliefs =you think your opinion is better. Come on man, that's just common sense, I don't need to be inside your head to figure that out.

I said it's asinine because it doesn't seem logical to me - not because I think mine is better. So if you want to assume that me stating my opinion is more logical and thus makes it better, then ok. While we are talking about opinions, I guess I have a right to think my opinion is better..

Quote:
These are two different vehicles, the mod for mod comparison does not apply here especially when racing from a dig.

Exactly.

-M

Last edited by Phoenyx : 09-01-2007 at 02:12 PM.
Phoenyx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2007, 03:35 PM   #56 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
dsmfan95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member Number: 529
Location: North Carolina
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,547
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by andrewsboots
Quote: Originally Posted by dsmfan95
Quote: Originally Posted by andrewsboots
Quote: Originally Posted by dsmfan95
Quote: Originally Posted by andrewsboots
Quote: Originally Posted by Phoenyx
Nice way to beat on the lowly powered EVOs..

Try running something more your speed - like a GT35R EVO with cams, meth, etc.. I seriously doubt you'd fly past him from a dig..

-M

^^ thanks captain obvious.

anyway,
Stage 3 turbo is not a BIG turbo. Anyone else see it this way?

It isn't a big turbo, but that's what I would have gotten if I had kept my SRT-4. The powerband is very appealing.

It's not a big turbo, but it's still bigger than a stock Evo

Are you sure? I'll bet you one dollar that the evo 9 turbo is bigger than a stage 3.

Bigger meaning it flows more punds per minute.

What's the flow on a stock wheeled stage 3 with cams? Most bolt-on Evo9's won't clear 40lbs/min. Cammed ones with race gas usually peak out around 43lbs/min. They won't flow as much as a Stage 3 with an upgraded wheel. This is using a pocketlogger. Are there any Stage3's that have logged theirs or can you log SRT-4s like that?

I'm not going based on ratings because I think the Evo9 is rated low, those are peak flow numbers from what I've seen on the forums.

I have not flow tested a stage 3. Just going off of the turbine and compressor housing + wheel. I'm not sure what size turbine wheel the stage 3 has. but the evo nine compressor housing is bigger than stage 3.

Ok, then I'll bet you that dollar
dsmfan95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2007, 05:22 PM   #57 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
njshift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Member Number: 5417
Location: nj
Trader Rating: (14)
Posts: 1,851
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by Phoenyx
Quote: Originally Posted by njshift
So to surmise, you make a negative comment about my opinion then you continue to reiterate your beliefs =you think your opinion is better. Come on man, that's just common sense, I don't need to be inside your head to figure that out.

I said it's asinine because it doesn't seem logical to me - not because I think mine is better. So if you want to assume that me stating my opinion is more logical and thus makes it better, then ok. While we are talking about opinions, I guess I have a right to think my opinion is better..

Quote:
These are two different vehicles, the mod for mod comparison does not apply here especially when racing from a dig.

Exactly.

-M

Very well. It was a pleasure discussing this with you.

Greg
njshift is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2007, 08:48 PM   #58 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
Robdevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Member Number: 43959
Location: OKC
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 147
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by dodgeneonsrt4
well my friend does'nt believe me that a stock for stock evo and srt-4 off a roll of about 55-60 srt-4 will beat evo's what do you guys think ???

Stock for Stock from a roll a SRT-4 would beat an EVO VIII in most cases.

However, the SRT-4 should not beat a IX, period.


Good vids, sad driver in the EVO though, very sad.
__________________
Lightning Yellow Evo
AMS 2.3 Stroker, AEM EMS, PTE 67DBB Turbo, 1 Lead Foot + Supporting mods. :Running on E-85:

Last edited by Robdevo : 09-03-2007 at 08:48 AM.
Robdevo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 06:24 AM   #59 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
dsmfan95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member Number: 529
Location: North Carolina
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,547
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by Robdevo
Quote: Originally Posted by dodgeneonsrt4
well my friend does'nt believe me that a stock for stock evo and srt-4 off a roll of about 55-60 srt-4 will beat evo's what do you guys think ???

Stock for Stock from a roll a SRT-4 would be an EVO VIII in most cases.

However, the SRT-4 should not beat a IX, period.


Good vids, sad driver in the EVO though, very sad.

I would say it would be a good race with an 05 Evo, but I would give the edge to the Evo stock vs stock. The 03-04 Evo's would probably get pulled stock vs stock.
dsmfan95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 07:22 AM   #60 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
RomeoOG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Member Number: 24664
Location: Houston TX
Trader Rating: (11)
Posts: 450
Default

Good race...
__________________
Power Mods: Stage 0, AGP WG set at 22-15, MSD 8.5 Wires, AEM Intake, 3 Inch Turbo back Exhaust, Big FMIC, Map Clamps, Fuel Return Lines. Best Time was at Houston Raceway Park on Slicks 12.5@109 Other Mods: Short Shifter, Shift Lights, AEM Wideband, AM Oil Gauge, Greddy TT, Fan Mod, Custom Made Oil Catch Can, All Hose Clamps Changed, HKS BOV, Gold Line Spring 1.5 Drop, 10K HIDs, CLK Rear Lights, Pioneer MP3/WMA HU, 17 Inch 5 Spokes Katana
RomeoOG is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Register Home Forum Photo Gallery Active Topics (D) Chat VBay [0] Mark Forums Read
  SRT Forums - SRT4, SRT6, SRT8, SRT10 & Dodge Forum > SRT-4 Other Discussion > SRT Videos




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Google Links

» Wheel & Tire Center

Sponsors

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:46 AM.

(C) SRTforums.com
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.