Sorry, a member asked for an "intelligable" ( ) response. So I gave one to him. I know you guy's must not get those around here quite often...
Don't use words you don't know how to spell. That's the second or third time in this thread you spelled the word "intelligible" with an "a" instead of a "i".
Main Entry: in·tel·li·gi·ble
Pronunciation: in-'te-l&-j&-b&l
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin intelligibilis, from intelligere
1 : apprehensible by the intellect only
2 : capable of being understood or comprehended
I know you don't get definitions of words you use and don't know how to spell too often. So I thought I would help you out with some history and meaning of the word you are trying to use.
Sorry, a member asked for an "intelligable" ( ) response. So I gave one to him. I know you guy's must not get those around here quite often...
Don't use words you don't know how to spell. That's the second or third time in this thread you spelled the word "intelligible" with an "a" instead of a "i".
Main Entry: in·tel·li·gi·ble
Pronunciation: in-'te-l&-j&-b&l
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin intelligibilis, from intelligere
1 : apprehensible by the intellect only
2 : capable of being understood or comprehended
I know you don't get definitions of words you use and don't know how to spell too often. So I thought I would help you out with some history and meaning of the word you are trying to use.
You see, now thats funny.
Hey white, my honest opinion... You are half way to being a retard, yet for some reason you think your are some kind of genius or something. Always trying to correct people spelling errors, or punctuation mistakes. If you were half as smart as you think you are, you would've realized I was making fun of who ever said that. How can you ask someone to make an intelligent response to something, and then spell the word intelligent wrong. I found it pretty funny. And now, I find your intelligence funny.
once again, someone who really doesnt belong on these forums, thinking they are better than the people who have a right to be on these forums.
if you drive a honda, then why are you hear? it's simply to instigate, and then call the people who disagree with you immature, childish, whatever.
you know exactly what you are doing, so it is people like you who are the immature idiots who have nothing better to do than make a post and wait for someone to have a differing opinion.
nothing wrong with liking, driving, owning a honda. however, you show your true colors when you go on a forum that you have no business on, simply to start up with someone else. go jump on the honda forums and argue which one of you guys has the faster k20 swap.
once again, someone who really doesnt belong on these forums, thinking they are better than the people who have a right to be on these forums.
if you drive a honda, then why are you hear? it's simply to instigate, and then call the people who disagree with you immature, childish, whatever.
you know exactly what you are doing, so it is people like you who are the immature idiots who have nothing better to do than make a post and wait for someone to have a differing opinion.
nothing wrong with liking, driving, owning a honda. however, you show your true colors when you go on a forum that you have no business on, simply to start up with someone else. go jump on the honda forums and argue which one of you guys has the faster k20 swap.
See I just don't understand this post. We know it is an SRT forum. But some people take pride in more than one make/model of a car on here. If you refer to page one, you will see TAMADX say that it sucks to lose to an S2K. Rev2tenK asked why it sucks, and BLKDOUTSRT4 says because they are slow. If you think we don't have a right to be on this forum, then why can we sign up? I think many of you are misinformed on everything that isn't yours currently, and that's what brewed the argument. All rev2ten did was question why somebody would say the car's slow after it beats your own. That's all he asked.
I have seen a stock S2000 pull high 13's before. What do stock SRT-4's average in the 1/4. You all became the ignorant ones calling a car that can run the same time as an SRT-4....slow? I mean, from the vid it looks like he pulled pretty decent on the Neon.
NOT ONE person on here gave the S2000 props or was nice about it. They just sat there and made excuses and told stories about how they beat some S2000's and blah blah blah. A bunch of nonsense. It's people like you guys who give the Neon a bad name to alot of people. I can say this though if any of you think S2000's are slow, then so is an SRT-4. Flame on you haters. Your car got beat by Honda, let's cry some more and make up excuses. End of story.
I can say the same for you Honda owners... Don't cry when a "Neon" beats you.
To actually sit here and say we were flaming the S2K I can say the same for you and the rest of the Honda club in here. You guys were flaming the SRT-4.
So don't you think ignorance was among this whole thread including yourself? Don't sit back and play Mr. Innocent like you didn't say shit about the SRT-4. You were as plain ignorant as your calling me and the rest who went against you. Not one of you Honda Fanboy's gave props to the SRT-4.
AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned
enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share
experiences and opinions as a community.
j/p theyre both great cars why all the fightin?
big wheel stage 3 
) response. So I gave one to him. I know you guy's must not get those around here quite often...
Linear Mode
