Looking for GT PT Performance route..

[BLKDOUTSRT4]

Quote: Originally Posted by brngrhd

Quote: Originally Posted by BLKDOUTSRT4

i think a direct port nitrous setup is begged for with the design of that manifold..................but noone has awnsered my other question......do the higher hp pts put the t-850 in or is there something else they go to ? im curious if there is anyway to make a autostick srt-4 ......not mine i just want to get one for the wife...lol tried to get her into a turbo pt but she didnt like it and ended up in a rsx so when we go out i have to drive that slow ass car.......and to have her in a daily driven auto turbo is my dream so when we go out im not limited ..... it looks like its all moot cause shes either gonna get a srt-8 jeep or challenger(if its auto) or a new 135i ... we are both gettin new cars next year im keepin the neon for the daily

like this


my point is why come in to the pt section and trash talk pt's?

and no we have NEVER put an engine in any pt for any reason that i can think of much less crank walk.

mmm thats pretty....i think i woulda routed it up under the intake mani but that would make it a pain to fix any issues that might come up....

[KBzPTGT]

Quote: Originally Posted by BLKDOUTSRT4

Quote: Originally Posted by r.j-lo

not starting shit here, but you do know the PT motor is the same as the SRT one right? I have never heard of an SRT motor doing the crankwalk 2 step.

i never said it was the turbo motor....they share the same blocks now on turbo and n/a they used to be diff blocks...... but the n/a pts are crankwalking i was saying that i cant get away from the pts if i try as in i always have to work on them.....i never intended it as a statement to the 2.4 turbo

This is the Chrysler PT/GT Turbo Forum right?
Then don't compare n/a PT to turbo PT as far as motor work goes.
Your statement sounds like going into a 1st gen/2nd gen NEON forum and comparing their short comings to the TURBO SRT4?
Or compare 1st gen DSM (GSX/GST)
with the 'crankwalk' 2nd gen Chrysler/Mitsu (GSX/GST)
with say 3rd gen Eclipse?
Compare apples to apples is what I'm getting at
(if the above info is incorrect, oops
NEON

[BLKDOUTSRT4]

Quote: Originally Posted by KBzPTGT

Quote: Originally Posted by BLKDOUTSRT4

Quote: Originally Posted by r.j-lo

not starting shit here, but you do know the PT motor is the same as the SRT one right? I have never heard of an SRT motor doing the crankwalk 2 step.

i never said it was the turbo motor....they share the same blocks now on turbo and n/a they used to be diff blocks...... but the n/a pts are crankwalking i was saying that i cant get away from the pts if i try as in i always have to work on them.....i never intended it as a statement to the 2.4 turbo

This is the Chrysler PT/GT Turbo Forum right?
Then don't compare n/a PT to turbo PT as far as motor work goes.
Your statement sounds like going into a 1st gen/2nd gen NEON forum and comparing their short comings to the TURBO SRT4?
Or compare 1st gen DSM (GSX/GST)
with the 'crankwalk' 2nd gen Chrysler/Mitsu (GSX/GST)
with say 3rd gen Eclipse?
Compare apples to apples is what I'm getting at
(if the above info is incorrect, oops
NEON

he asked what i had to do with pts...and why i dont like them that was the reason