...On a stock bottom end, running 26 psi, revving to 7100 RPM. Those are SAE corrected numbers...Didn't think to get the correction factor, but I did ask what the uncorrected HP was, and was told 550. Still very very impressive.
I'm in Salt Lake City, Utah. Elevation is roughly 4500 FT.
Go ahead, call bullshit. But this is the real deal. I will have some pics of the dyno graph, as well as some video footage very soon. Friend of mine is uploading the footage to his computer.
Anyway...It was nuts. Car made 390 HP on 14 psi, so i knew it was on from there.
Mod list:
AMS 37R turbo kit
AEM EMS
JMCylinder heads CNC Ported/polished w/oversize valves
Crower(original) S2 Camshafts, set to 0 , 0
Stock bottom end, w/balance shaft delete
LFS 60mm TB/spacer
ED superbeast
MPx 3" TBE
ACT 6-puck
Plans for a built motor may be getting pushed forward sooner, now that I'm playing with a ticking time bomb...LOL
Thanks go out to Cortney Green. He is the tuning master that pulled those numbers from my car without blowing it up. If anyone keeps up with SFWD, you'll recognize his name. I believe he is Number 1 in points in both divisions. He drives a mid 9 second civic hatch with a 4294 turbo, and a B18 engine.
...On a stock bottom end, running 26 psi, revving to 7100 RPM. Those are SAE corrected numbers...Didn't think to get the correction factor, but I did ask what the uncorrected HP was, and was told 550. Still very very impressive.
I'm in Salt Lake City, Utah. Elevation is roughly 4500 FT.
Go ahead, call bullshit. But this is the real deal. I will have some pics of the dyno graph, as well as some video footage very soon. Friend of mine is uploading the footage to his computer.
Anyway...It was nuts. Car made 390 HP on 14 psi, so i knew it was on from there.
Mod list:
AMS 37R turbo kit
AEM EMS
JMCylinder heads CNC Ported/polished w/oversize valves
Crower(original) S2 Camshafts, set to 0 , 0
Stock bottom end, w/balance shaft delete
LFS 60mm TB/spacer
ED superbeast
MPx 3" TBE
ACT 6-puck
Plans for a built motor may be getting pushed forward sooner, now that I'm playing with a ticking time bomb...LOL
Thanks go out to Cortney Green. He is the tuning master that pulled those numbers from my car without blowing it up. If anyone keeps up with SFWD, you'll recognize his name. I believe he is Number 1 in points in both divisions. He drives a mid 9 second civic hatch with a 4294 turbo, and a B18 engine.
Ok I call BS. That is a bunch of crap!!!!
Nice numbers man . Some day I hope to have cash for those numbers.
__________________
S1, S2 WGA, wheels and tires, AGP Dog Bones, H-brace and traction bars, SRI,Ebay intercooler, 3" O2, Max Fab W/cat, custom Mopar/Borla, LM-1, and a little laughing gas 359hp and 440tq. Nitrous! my cure for depresion.
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination
Roughly 4500 rpm it's fully spooled. It hits peak tq at 5k, though.
Also, regarding the TQ vs the HP, you have to understand that HP is a by-product of TQ. The equation for HP is TQ x RPM / 5252. That means that any HP measurement above 5252 rpm will always be higher than the TQ measurement. So, given that the turbo doesn't hit full spool till 4500 rpm, and peak tq doesn't come on until 5k, and doesn't hardly die off after that, HP will compound and always be higher than TQ. There's no way around it.
The reason that TQ is so overbearing on small turbos is because it peaks much earlier in the rpm band, and dies off much quicker. So HP never gets the chance to compound higher than TQ with as quick as the smaller turbos loose their breath. It is still higher than TQ after 5252 rpm, but by then, the TQ is dropping rapidly, so therefore the HP will only carry to about 5800 rpm or so.
Look at any SRT with a 61 mm turbo (aka GT35R, SC61 etc etc) or larger, and the HP will always outweigh the TQ.
Roughly 4500 rpm it's fully spooled. It hits peak tq at 5k, though.
Also, regarding the TQ vs the HP, you have to understand that HP is a by-product of TQ. The equation for HP is TQ x RPM / 5252. That means that any HP measurement above 5252 rpm will always be higher than the TQ measurement. So, given that the turbo doesn't hit full spool till 4500 rpm, and peak tq doesn't come on until 5k, and doesn't hardly die off after that, HP will compound and always be higher than TQ. There's no way around it.
The reason that TQ is so overbearing on small turbos is because it peaks much earlier in the rpm band, and dies off much quicker. So HP never gets the chance to compound higher than TQ with as quick as the smaller turbos loose their breath. It is still higher than TQ after 5252 rpm, but by then, the TQ is dropping rapidly, so therefore the HP will only carry to about 5800 rpm or so.
Look at any SRT with a 61 mm turbo (aka GT35R, SC61 etc etc) or larger, and the HP will always outweigh the TQ.
Uhh... I think you're too smart for your own good and someone needs to hit you in the head with a hammer to make you as dumb as the rest of civilization.
AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned
enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share
experiences and opinions as a community.