Injector duty cycle - SRT Forums

catlin987987 · 06-14-2008, 05:47 PM

How close is the aeroforce's reading of the Injector duty cycle?

Turbocruiser13 · 06-15-2008, 01:29 AM

I'd recommend posting this up in aeroforce's thread. I've heard both ways. I've seen some guys who claim 115% IDC (which obviously isn't possible) and I've heard other guys say it's pretty accurate. I'd say if you're anywhere above 85% though it's time to search for more fuel.

duster360 · 06-16-2008, 12:33 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by catlin987987

How close is the aeroforce's reading of the Injector duty cycle?

Its complete worthless crap. DO NOT make any judgements based off it. imo Todd at Error-farce, is incompetant, especially in explaining the worth of 100%+ DC.

I was wondering the same thing a while ago.

Max Pulsewidth Based On RPM??

Neil made some interesting comments on the ipw out of the DRB-III being suspect. I plan on(im a terible procrastinator) designing a small circut to capture the DC and log it straight from the injectors.

tamadx · 06-16-2008, 12:36 PM

intresting to see if it truly accurate or even close.

catlin987987 · 06-16-2008, 06:12 PM

isn't 100% duty cycle the maximum the injectors are designed for?

Turbocruiser13 · 06-17-2008, 01:59 AM

Yep...that's why a lot of people call BS on the aeroforce's readings, because we've seen 115% and sometimes above from it before. I'd say on a fairly bone stock srt with no fuel mods and no boost being hidden and no map being altered it's fairly accurate. On a modified car pushing more boost, bigger than stock injectors, and/or a mapclamp or fuel controller the IDC has no clue what it's at anymore, so naturally you'd get a false reading.