|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Rules | Photo Gallery | Active Topics (D) | Chat | Insurance | Mark Forums Read | Advertise | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
SRTforums Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Member Number: 62465
Location: St. Joseph, MO
Posts: 1,680
|
Im not gonna post a mod list (because its in countless threads) but I was pretty much bolt on's, stock turbo, stock manifold, stock O2 housing.
310HP and 436TQ at Boomba's mustang dyno. 26-28 PSI spike holding whatever it can. About 30 degrees into boost, high 30's at redline. AFR's were in the high 11's. I tuned it. Damn that's a high boost spike for the stocker lol but the numbers are awesome and you prolly coulda went a tad bit leaner but I understand being safe...that's what I would want also |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
SRTforums Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Member Number: 62465
Location: St. Joseph, MO
Posts: 1,680
|
Speedy, if you plan on stickign with the stock turbo, anythign that will make it breathe will help to make more power, this includes modified stock manifolds, and O2 housings, and exhuast. However, there will be a point when your going to want more, i know this because of you mentioning that you had an AGP delta on one of your SRT's that you owned and you stated it was alot of fun, so a tiny little idea will pop in your head "if the stock turbo is this great on E85.. what will a BIGGER turbo do on it?" and it will pretty much snowball from there. don't waste the money on the modified stocker manifold, put it to the side and go big, like i know you eventually will.
I also had a 3076r car...that woulda been fun on e85 for sure...the plan for now is to get a clutch and a fuel system and go e85 on the stocker until I get the funds for something bigger like a PTE 5431e or similar |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
SRTforums Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Member Number: 62465
Location: St. Joseph, MO
Posts: 1,680
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but those torque numbers on a mustang dyno would be close to and over 500wtq on any other dyno...that seems ridiculous for the little stocker...the Evo guys on thier stock turbos aren't even getting that much torque...mine broke the local dyno shop's Evo stock turbo torque record with 430awtq and that was on a dynojet
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Fresh Meat Moderator
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Member Number: 76568
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,617
|
who knows lol. Im gonna probably wait till I have another srt to DD then build this one. Damn that's a high boost spike for the stocker lol but the numbers are awesome and you prolly coulda went a tad bit leaner but I understand being safe...that's what I would want also
I had some boost issues that day and was trying to quickly lean it out before I dynoed. Did the best I could in the time I had lol Correct me if I'm wrong, but those torque numbers on a mustang dyno would be close to and over 500wtq on any other dyno...that seems ridiculous for the little stocker...the Evo guys on thier stock turbos aren't even getting that much torque...mine broke the local dyno shop's Evo stock turbo torque record with 430awtq and that was on a dynojet
Torque numbers between a dyno jet and mustang dyno would stay about the same. Its the HP numbers that would change. I
__________________
![]() Diablo CMR tuner ~Dan~ 2004 Black Neon SRT4: E85 stock turbo SOLD ![]() 310HP 436TQ 2004 Eblue Neon SRT4: E85 5558 ![]() XXXHP XXXTQ |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Premium Member (Lifetime)
SRT of the Month ![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Member Number: 32888
Location: N. La/ E. Tx
Posts: 7,708
|
We been over it. No problems no slipping clutch. 4th gear. It was a spike with the boost.
Any ways this is why I hate dyno numbers. I trapped 114.5 and 114.8 with my stocker. Autoguide.com App
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Premium Member (Lifetime)
SRT of the Month ![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Member Number: 32888
Location: N. La/ E. Tx
Posts: 7,708
|
I've had act hdss for a year and a half now. It was on the car when I bought it.
It been 114 on stocker 117 on BWS And 125 on 5831. It's broke an axle And had over 75 launches/burn outs 10ish - 1.9 30ish 1.8 60fts 2 - 1.7 1 - 1.6 About 10 2 gear burn outs Hmm alot stress haha. So far so good. Autoguide.com App
__________________
Last edited by underSRTarmor; 11-06-2012 at 07:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Premium Member (Lifetime)
SRT of the Month ![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Member Number: 32888
Location: N. La/ E. Tx
Posts: 7,708
|
Thats why the track doesn't lie.
Thanks for sharing underSRT, hopefully this information will help me max my stock snail. No prob. I like sharing my success and failures. Help other folks have good success and not make the same mistakes I made. Might save u some money. Autoguide.com App
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
SRTforums Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Member Number: 80561
Location: monterey
Posts: 656
|
Both of those MD #'s seem a little inflated for your traps.
That'd put under and tuner to 335-350hp range. 450-500tq. Only 114mph trap? We have locals that had 290-305hp/380-420tq DYNOJET do consistent 115-117 traps. Not blaming anyone or pointing fingers, Just unless those MD's had a CF to make it read out like a DJ, those were inflated numbers, is all. That being said, i DO believe you can do 330-350hp out of the stock turbo...just noone with the right setup has done it (aside from a select few that've done 330's.)
__________________
Pumpking.
10.71@140. 1st SRT in TENS in CA. Thanks to: TUNED BY MINDMELT101@DRAG-ON Tuning. - http://drag-ontuning.com/blog/ GOKEY RACING for anything fabrication related instagram for updates and pics: m_santiago37 |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
SRTforums Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2010
Member Number: 82263
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,363
|
Both of those MD #'s seem a little inflated for your traps.
That'd put under and tuner to 335-350hp range. 450-500tq. Only 114mph trap? We have locals that had 290-305hp/380-420tq DYNOJET do consistent 115-117 traps. Not blaming anyone or pointing fingers, Just unless those MD's had a CF to make it read out like a DJ, those were inflated numbers, is all. That being said, i DO believe you can do 330-350hp out of the stock turbo...just noone with the right setup has done it (aside from a select few that've done 330's.) you know that its not all about peak numbers right?
__________________
Tuned by Brian (Mindmelt101)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
SRTforums Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Member Number: 80561
Location: monterey
Posts: 656
|
Where did you get that I'm 'all about peak numbers' from my above post? My car has been north of 600hp for the past 3yrs, and probably north 700 for the past year...the last thing I care about is 'peak' numbers on a stock turbo, bud. ![]() I'm just iterating the truth. 310hp/450tq on a stock 02/manifold with pretty much no bolt ons aside from fmic/exhaust on a Mustang Dyno that generally reads 12-15% LOWER than a DJ (well suppose to atleast), is unlikely. And the traps show that. Nothing more, Nothing less.
__________________
Pumpking.
10.71@140. 1st SRT in TENS in CA. Thanks to: TUNED BY MINDMELT101@DRAG-ON Tuning. - http://drag-ontuning.com/blog/ GOKEY RACING for anything fabrication related instagram for updates and pics: m_santiago37 |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|