Wait, so you're wanting to INCREASE the revolutions per minute, but LOWER the "piston speed"? Please explain how this works.
Also, this "10K Honda crap" you speak of is a small part of the reason that Chris Miller and some of the other Honda/Acura guys are horsefucking everyone who gets in their path at the track, and have been for awhile now. Since when are more RPMs a bad thing? Assuming the engine is still capable of being effecient of course...
What I am saying is you should shit can the idea, of the Srt4 Reving to 10k ...unless u want a grenade motor. It doesn't need to rev like a Honda to make power.
I'm saying with our huge stroke and poor Rod ratio, the best and cheapest way to raise rev limits, is to get a better rod ratio. Using a shorter Rod isn't going to fix that ,and a smaller mm crank would...but there isn't one.
So It's using a longer Rod and work with what we have, 8,500 is pleanty of Rpm!
Honda and other cars can Rev to 10k because they have a short stroke, and good Rod ratios. Let's take a b16 motor just shits
B16A PR3: ROD LENGTH: 5.290” STROKE: 3.031” BORE SIZE: 3.189 “(81MM) COMPRESSION HEIGHTS:1.180” DOME HEIGHT: .098” WEIGHT: 299 GRAMS
= 1.75 Rod ratio
F1 cars are 2:1 or over... like I said before you want high revs big bore,short stroke,good Rod ratio, low piston speeds.
More Rpm is not a bad thing, its just not needed on the Srt-4 motor. People need to think outside the box here. The Honda guys are getting better 60' and have more $ and time than the Neon crowd.
It's time for real change here... It can be done with a 8,500 rpm, I don't even think you need that high. It's not a problem for the Srt4 motor to make power or Tq, its putting it to the ground!
17x8 245/40/17 ST40 BBK Project TRAIN DONE!11/13/09
04 -E-85 Ported Stock Turbo,Stock cams&Head,Stock Motor,Safc Neo
329.69Hp, 395.77Tq STD 297Hp@6K 320.87Hp, 385.18Tq SAE
Tube V-band,6266,9:1 Cr,E85,Fully Built,Dog Box,Soon!