interested in 2.3l de stroke kit - Page 2 - Dodge SRT Forum
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #16 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 04:20 AM Thread Starter
SRTforums Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ct
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah well my plan is to.rev the f*ck outta this thing

Il def leave feedback once its done i wanna run avenger head fuy ported bigger valves.. crane 26 cams with a big.fat snail

So revvin is.more then nessesery
slow acr is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #17 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 11:15 AM
SRTforums Member
 
04inred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fort Hood TX
Posts: 2,659
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by slow acr View Post
Yeah well my plan is to.rev the f*ck outta this thing

Il def leave feedback once its done i wanna run avenger head fuy ported bigger valves.. crane 26 cams with a big.fat snail

So revvin is.more then nessesery
RPMs in that case are needed, and to the guy doing the EF2 7500 RPMs would be fine for that with a good head.

On a side note 700hp can be made on a regular set up on a SRT head and a not so big turbo, so you are waisting money that you will need for drive train parts.

E-85 will keep it alive.
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination

Last edited by 04inred; 11-04-2012 at 11:55 AM.
04inred is offline  
post #18 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 01:00 PM
SRTforums Member
 
Racerxvsspeedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: I'm #UNO Sucka
Posts: 3,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by slow acr View Post
Yeah well my plan is to.rev the f*ck outta this thing

Il def leave feedback once its done i wanna run avenger head fuy ported bigger valves.. crane 26 cams with a big.fat snail

So revvin is.more then nessesery
This is another misconception using an avenger head. No need the stock head flows much better than most know, with bigger valves It's right up there with the best.
Unless you want the turbo in the front , lose half your cooling system go for it.
Turbo cars don't need that big of a cam 26+ is for all motor.

You would save so much $$ running long rods FM has a great combo already, built Srt4 head+ crane 18,20 or bc stage 3 or 4 or Bc daddy cams. Then run a 6266 or up to get where you want. With a 8,500 rpm and our stroke you will get there FAST!

Doing it another way is going to cost you $ time and headaches! IMHO

17x8 245/40/17 ST40 BBK Project TRAIN DONE!11/13/09
04 -E-85 Ported Stock Turbo,Stock cams&Head,Stock Motor,Safc Neo
329.69Hp, 395.77Tq STD 297Hp@6K 320.87Hp, 385.18Tq SAE
Tube V-band,6266,9:1 Cr,E85,Fully Built,Dog Box,Soon!
Racerxvsspeedracer is offline  
post #19 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 04:12 PM
SRTforums Member
 
strokedracer05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Belpre Ohio
Posts: 4,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racerxvsspeedracer View Post
This is another misconception using an avenger head. No need the stock head flows much better than most know, with bigger valves It's right up there with the best.
Unless you want the turbo in the front , lose half your cooling system go for it.
Turbo cars don't need that big of a cam 26+ is for all motor.

You would save so much $$ running long rods FM has a great combo already, built Srt4 head+ crane 18,20 or bc stage 3 or 4 or Bc daddy cams. Then run a 6266 or up to get where you want. With a 8,500 rpm and our stroke you will get there FAST!

Doing it another way is going to cost you $ time and headaches! IMHO

i agree with you on the head the head does flow great with the right person working on it....and thats a massive cam for a turbo car remember the cam grind is specifiacally designed for valve openings for that kind of rpm and ive seen with my own two eyes someone on a 67mm turbo spinning it just to 7800 rpms and have the best powerband i have ever saw
strokedracer05 is offline  
post #20 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 08:03 PM Thread Starter
SRTforums Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ct
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Josh?? Yeah i know i wanna run a forward facing turbo thats why avenger head
Crane 24/26 bc my.brother ran them in his 2.0l n had great results
Wanna destroke motor to.see 10k revs
slow acr is offline  
post #21 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 08:38 PM
SRTforums Member
 
Racerxvsspeedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: I'm #UNO Sucka
Posts: 3,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by slow acr View Post
Josh?? Yeah i know i wanna run a forward facing turbo thats why avenger head
Crane 24/26 bc my.brother ran them in his 2.0l n had great results
Wanna destroke motor to.see 10k revs
You got 2k just to spend on crank!
You want 10k ,build a 2.0l neon motor and put it in your Srt4.

17x8 245/40/17 ST40 BBK Project TRAIN DONE!11/13/09
04 -E-85 Ported Stock Turbo,Stock cams&Head,Stock Motor,Safc Neo
329.69Hp, 395.77Tq STD 297Hp@6K 320.87Hp, 385.18Tq SAE
Tube V-band,6266,9:1 Cr,E85,Fully Built,Dog Box,Soon!
Racerxvsspeedracer is offline  
post #22 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 09:12 PM
Premium Member (Lifetime)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,313
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
I have revved The 2.4l to 10k without major issue, I have a billet crank now to see if crank deflection is kept to a minimum I have smashed a bearing or two revving The stock crank that high billet 2.4 should make it much easier on bearings.
kevinwarren240 is offline  
post #23 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 09:45 PM
SRTforums Member
 
Racerxvsspeedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: I'm #UNO Sucka
Posts: 3,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinwarren240 View Post
I have revved The 2.4l to 10k without major issue, I have a billet crank now to see if crank deflection is kept to a minimum I have smashed a bearing or two revving The stock crank that high billet 2.4 should make it much easier on bearings.
It's the poor Rod ratio, and piston speeds that are the problem.
Why can't you rev under 8,500 and make power and break records? No need for this 10k Honda crap, I could see if you're running All Motor... But we are using turbos different world, and ways to get there.
People that want to Rev to 10k+ will need short stroke,big bore,good Rod Ratio and low piston speeds.

With our motor we need to set it up different.
We have big stroke, so It's long rod + bigger bore raise CR and good amount. Keep Rev limited to 8,500 which should be more than enough. Turbo selection will be the hardest, but lots to choose from.

17x8 245/40/17 ST40 BBK Project TRAIN DONE!11/13/09
04 -E-85 Ported Stock Turbo,Stock cams&Head,Stock Motor,Safc Neo
329.69Hp, 395.77Tq STD 297Hp@6K 320.87Hp, 385.18Tq SAE
Tube V-band,6266,9:1 Cr,E85,Fully Built,Dog Box,Soon!
Racerxvsspeedracer is offline  
post #24 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 10:04 PM
SRTforums Member
 
D-SRT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: monterey
Posts: 968
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
'revved to 10k no problems'...

'just smashed a few bearings along the way'..




Great! Lets post that the stock rod angle ratio/stroke is ok to rev to 10k to the average viewer on here that doesn't know anything...

Pumpking.
v2.0 completed..
10.31@147, 1.89 60'. 1st SRT in TENS in CA. FASTEST IN CAQUICKEST AND FASTEST EMAIL TUNED. SOLD.

Support:
MINDMELT101 TUNED. , GOKEY RACING, , Crower
IG: m_santiago37
D-SRT is offline  
post #25 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 10:04 PM
SRTforums Member
 
Racerxvsspeedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: I'm #UNO Sucka
Posts: 3,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Garage
If someone could mod the old 2.2l crank to work, then we would have a better option.
And it would be a 2.3l when It's all done.

17x8 245/40/17 ST40 BBK Project TRAIN DONE!11/13/09
04 -E-85 Ported Stock Turbo,Stock cams&Head,Stock Motor,Safc Neo
329.69Hp, 395.77Tq STD 297Hp@6K 320.87Hp, 385.18Tq SAE
Tube V-band,6266,9:1 Cr,E85,Fully Built,Dog Box,Soon!
Racerxvsspeedracer is offline  
post #26 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 10:11 PM Thread Starter
SRTforums Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ct
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Racer.... I dont want a 2.0l motor

I swapped the srt motor into my 1g im not swapping back.jst to rev it
slow acr is offline  
post #27 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 10:12 PM
SRTforums Member
 
Racerxvsspeedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: I'm #UNO Sucka
Posts: 3,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-SRT View Post
'revved to 10k no problems'...

'just smashed a few bearings along the way'..




Great! Lets post that the stock rod angle ratio/stroke is ok to rev to 10k to the average viewer on here that doesn't know anything...
Rod length 5.944 in
Crank stroke 3.976 in (101.0 mm)
= 1.50 Rod Ratio and is crap for Reving to 10k Lol

17x8 245/40/17 ST40 BBK Project TRAIN DONE!11/13/09
04 -E-85 Ported Stock Turbo,Stock cams&Head,Stock Motor,Safc Neo
329.69Hp, 395.77Tq STD 297Hp@6K 320.87Hp, 385.18Tq SAE
Tube V-band,6266,9:1 Cr,E85,Fully Built,Dog Box,Soon!
Racerxvsspeedracer is offline  
post #28 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 10:12 PM Thread Starter
SRTforums Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ct
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Just a fyi i have a 98 acr with srt swap... Not a srt
slow acr is offline  
post #29 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 10:20 PM
SRTforums Member
 
Racerxvsspeedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: I'm #UNO Sucka
Posts: 3,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Garage
FM Rods
6.160In
=1.55 Rod ratio still not there but its better than stock.

17x8 245/40/17 ST40 BBK Project TRAIN DONE!11/13/09
04 -E-85 Ported Stock Turbo,Stock cams&Head,Stock Motor,Safc Neo
329.69Hp, 395.77Tq STD 297Hp@6K 320.87Hp, 385.18Tq SAE
Tube V-band,6266,9:1 Cr,E85,Fully Built,Dog Box,Soon!
Racerxvsspeedracer is offline  
post #30 of 160 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 10:24 PM
SRTforums Member
 
Racerxvsspeedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: I'm #UNO Sucka
Posts: 3,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by slow acr View Post
Just a fyi i have a 98 acr with srt swap... Not a srt
Ok It's doesn't matter.
You still don't need to rev past 8,500. This motor will make more than enough power,and still have a great powerband at that level.

17x8 245/40/17 ST40 BBK Project TRAIN DONE!11/13/09
04 -E-85 Ported Stock Turbo,Stock cams&Head,Stock Motor,Safc Neo
329.69Hp, 395.77Tq STD 297Hp@6K 320.87Hp, 385.18Tq SAE
Tube V-band,6266,9:1 Cr,E85,Fully Built,Dog Box,Soon!
Racerxvsspeedracer is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome