was just making a reference. the numbers are from way back in like june. was a shitty tune actually also. real numbers was 422whp. i have a .82 backside also... going to be running a 63 now.
was just making a reference. the numbers are from way back in like june. was a shitty tune actually also. real numbers was 422whp. i have a .82 backside also... going to be running a 63 now.
I would do the .63 but my compressor isnt ported (not a baller) I have the feeling I'm gonna use alot of antilag to make up for it (3200 spool)
I would do the .63 but my compressor isnt ported (not a baller) I have the feeling I'm gonna use alot of antilag to make up for it (3200 spool)
lol dude the damn EC-1 is only like 200$ lmao i wouldnt have got it anyother way. it makes the turbo sound like a damn SEMI its insane how loud it is even in vacuum
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.