4300k vs 6000k - SRT Forums

haknslash · 04-30-2007, 09:01 PM

Did a little test using neonelite10's aftermarket 6000k bulb he sent me versus a new 4300k Philips 85122.

The pics are a tad underexposed. I was rushed by some vicious sounding dogs coming down from some guys driveway

They are pretty close though to real world performance.

Wall shot...

4300k by itself...

6000k by itself...

Both...

This damn 18-70mm always seems to get lame ass orbs and lens flares

_________________

neonelite10 · 04-30-2007, 09:35 PM

Perfect to show just how dimmer the higher color temps get. I can't imagine how bad uit must suck to have a 10,000K junk kit.

haknslash · 04-30-2007, 09:39 PM

I meant to ask you, is that a new 6000k bulb or used? If used, approx. how many hours? I know they will bring it up on HIDP

neonelite10 · 04-30-2007, 09:52 PM

Brandy new, the 4300K is fairly new as well, I don't recall, it either has none, or maybe 2 hours of use.

FloridaBoy07 · 05-01-2007, 09:45 AM

6k didnt look that bad off

haknslash · 05-01-2007, 01:53 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by FloridaBoy07

6k didnt look that bad off

Are you serious? In person 6k is a joke next to 4300k. It's hard to show in the pics but the pics show enough to get the idea.

SRT4Blubyu · 05-01-2007, 04:44 PM

4300K > 6000k any day. Just my .02 cents

SRT-4_UK · 05-03-2007, 10:46 PM

Just out of curiosity, what is the right shutter speed and aperture for real world performance?

haknslash · 05-07-2007, 06:45 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by SRT-4_UK

Just out of curiosity, what is the right shutter speed and aperture for real world performance?

As mentioned, these are a tad underexposed.