Quote: Originally Posted by
Toyota-Mopar 
I would like to get a handgun and I'm torn between the two.
What do you guys recommend that doesn't cost too much but also holds a good amount of rounds.
I know revolvers are more reliable but I like semi-automatics much better.
Btw, what's the difference between single and double action?
The 9mm is probably cheaper but doesn't have the stopping power of a 45.
I wanna be able to stop a fat hairy liberal from breaking into my home and stealing my stuff and sodomizing my dogs.
ideally, you want something that puts the biggest hole in them possible. you also have to worry about over penetration, do you live in a house or an apartment? 9mm is usually cheaper, but not by much. it also will hold more rounds and has less recoil, so is more accurate for newer shooters.
as for SA vs DA:
Single-action auto means you pull the hammer back before pulling the trigger or the action cocks the hammer before pulling the trigger.
Double-action means you can lower the hammer to half-cock (or, if you're really brave, lower it all the way) then pull the trigger and it will cock the hammer during the trigger pull before dropping it on the firing pin. Then there are striker-fired, which are generally double-action only, being cocked by the pull of the trigger, rather than the action cycling. (There may be some single-action striker-fired autos, but none come immediately to mind.)
DA/SA can fire both ways.
DAO can only fire double-action (trigger pull cocks the hammer)
SA can only fire single-action (cock the hammer, then pull the trigger)
"Having trained, and trained with a variety of law enforcement, I see many who prefer single action autos (specifically the 1911 pattern gun) over double action autos.
Amongst those "in the know," it is primarily because of the fact that on a single action auto, the first shot is just like the rest, and that can occasionally be critical. Something else to understand from an historical perspective, the 1911 and Browning HP (originally S/A), as designed by Browning, were for military use. This is a fine point: when a military handgun is drawn in combat, it IS going to be used! It's a last ditch weapon...and a military one at that. Traditionally military smallarms have all been single action in nature, that is the trigger performs a single action: dropping the hammer or striker. Note the pump action shotgun, M1 Garand, Mauser Kar-98, M1 Carbine, M-14, M16...all have single action triggers. Browning knew the advantages of a single action weapon.
For civilian use (defensively speaking), what I teach is this: the PERFECT DEFENSIVE use of a handgun, is when the handgun STOPS the attack WITHOUT having to be fired. Here is where, perhaps, a double action handgun has a small advantage: it is far more forgiving for any sloppy trigger-finger work than a single action auto. When a military combatant pulls his handgun, it's to shoot it. When a civilian pulls a handgun, he or she may not be shooting it. Grandma in the wheelchair or uncle Charley grabbing his gun from the drawer really do not want to have to shoot someone, but, ready or not, they have the gun to do it should push come to shove.
Does this mean I advocate less than perfect training and practice? NO! But, it does mean I recognize that the world is not perfect, and people goof.
Now, the choice. First, a single action handgun such as the Browning HP or a 1911 pattern gun require more training to be safe, and are far less forgiving for any mistake made. Double action handguns are inherently safer (read "foolish friendly"), but that first double action shot is tough to make fast AND accurate, and then there is the slight grip/trigger change to accomodate the rest of the shots which will be single action in nature.
Neither really has any distinct advantage (defensively speaking) over the other, if and only if, you as a shooter take the time to become proficient with the weapon you choose. Or, more accurately, any advantage the single action handgun has is usually outweighed by the myraid of other concerns and circumstances that will arise from such an occasion.
In competition, single action autos rule the day when speed is wieghted just ahead of accuracy, as in IPSC shooting. But, this is primarily because these competitors are being measured in tenths of a second, and that first double action shot could make or break you, from either a time or accuracy point of view. With a double action auto, you get either speed, or accuracy, but not both to the same degree that a single action auto will net for you.
On a last note, when training people or shooting in my club, I see many double action shooters thumb the hammer back before they start shooting the stage or practicing on the target.
I stop them, have them safely lower the hammer, and shoot their first shot from D/A. I say "You chose the gun, learn to shoot it right, or buy a 1911!"