Go Back   SRT Forums - SRT4, SRT6, SRT8, SRT10 & Dodge Forum > Site Functions > General Car Discussion
Register Home ForumForum Rules Photo Gallery Active Topics (D) Chat Mark Forums Read


SRTForums.com is the premier Dodge Neon SRT-4 on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-05-2008, 11:46 AM   #3946 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
xneonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Member Number: 39722
Location: OrangeCounty CA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 308
Default



srt-8 interior, supplied by oh20
__________________
2006 Charger R/T R&T FOR SALE $22,900

Last edited by xneonx : 02-05-2008 at 02:32 PM.
xneonx is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-05-2008, 12:55 PM   #3947 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
UN4GTBL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Member Number: 36137
Location: Canada
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 458
Default

More here:
LC: 2008 Dodge Challenger (and 2009 Challenger)

I liek it, it looks better with the mygig. but that auto
UN4GTBL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 06:01 PM   #3948 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
hharper1321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Member Number: 2196
Location: Baltimore, MD
Trader Rating: (6)
Posts: 292
Default

so, what, no telemetry? That was the coolest feature of the concept's interior. Except, of course, for the interior
__________________
2004 PT GT -Stage 1 and some bolt ons
1996 Eclipse RS - In the garage and being reborn
hharper1321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 08:06 PM   #3949 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
xneonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Member Number: 39722
Location: OrangeCounty CA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 308
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by hharper1321 View Post
so, what, no telemetry? That was the coolest feature of the concept's interior. Except, of course, for the interior

the telemetry is done on the EVIC on the spedo gauge (on the bottom of it actually) if im not mistaken
xneonx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 06:27 AM   #3950 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
dodgeboy68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Member Number: 6076
Location: Loudoun, VA
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 339
Default

finally Autoblog has the full spread! Did anyone else notice the that little butterflys in the hood scoops were replaced with plastic?

Chicago 2008: It's here - 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8 - Autoblog

This was my favorite in the picture gallery:

__________________
Cars: 04 Electric Blue SRT4, 95 Intrepid-sold, 85 Shelby Charger w/2.2 turbo-sold, 68 Charger w/383-sold
dodgeboy68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 10:09 AM   #3951 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
xneonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Member Number: 39722
Location: OrangeCounty CA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 308
Default

So the official specs are out for the challenger, and the weight is 4,140 lbs!!! My 06 charger r/t weighs 4,031 lbs.. how the hell did they manage to shorten the LX platform and build a smaller car that weighs more?

2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8: Revealed, Officially!
xneonx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 10:14 AM   #3952 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
Jagok1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Member Number: 14366
Location: Miami, FL
Trader Rating: (18)
Posts: 5,913
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by xneonx View Post
So the official specs are out for the challenger, and the weight is 4,140 lbs!!! My 06 charger r/t weighs 4,031 lbs.. how the hell did they manage to shorten the LX platform and build a smaller car that weighs more?

2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8: Revealed, Officially!

More heavy-duty equipment Sucks that it weighs so much
__________________
AGP GT40 -> 317@16psi -> 370@21psi -> Race #'s soon Tuned by NemoFoss
Jagok1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 10:28 AM   #3953 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Member Number: 3797
Location: Tucson
Trader Rating: (8)
Posts: 2,007
Default

That weight makes it a definite no for me. What a shame, looks pretty good though.
enginjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 10:52 AM   #3954 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
SRTGallardo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Member Number: 39792
Location: DenCO
Trader Rating: (4)
Posts: 1,711
Default

Ohhhhh-oh
__________________
Any Car > WRX's > Ford's

Basic Stage 1
SRTGallardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 12:43 PM   #3955 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Member Number: 17360
Location: Eastern PA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 111
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by enginjoe View Post
That weight makes it a definite no for me. What a shame, looks pretty good though.

Am I the only one that really doesn't give two shits about the weight? I think that some of you just have to come to the realization that this car is based off a more upmarket/"luxury"(used very loosely) vehicle built for comfort and practicality. There was no existing sports coupe or chasis that would have made this car economically viable otherwise. Go and buy an elise or an exige if you want a light weight sports coupe(either of which costs more, by the way), not something whose drivetrain alone weighs more than those cars.

Personally, I will buy one for sheer looks alone and secondly performance once the 392 with a 6 speed hits in a couple years. That car will humble 99% of the cars out there when I want it to and look awesome doing it.
srtdrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 01:08 PM   #3956 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Member Number: 17360
Location: Eastern PA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 111
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by Illegal Machine View Post
They can't even have one CAR steering wheel, and one Mini-Van/Truck steering wheel?

They can really only afford to produce ONE type of steering wheel at a time?

Really?

Does the Ford Focus, Ford F-150 and Mustang have the same wheel?

Ohhh, that must be why Ford is in bad financial shape, and Chrylser is doing great....

OR, its the reason Chrysler's interiors continue to be a joke.

Sorry to bring this up again, but your argument is absolutely terrible. You argue that an economy car, truck, and sports car have different steering wheels for one manufacturer and alude to the fact that dodge uses the same wheel for all three of those types of vehicles.

economy car


truck


sports car


Am I missing something? Thanks allpar and dodge for the pictures.
srtdrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 03:29 PM   #3957 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Member Number: 3797
Location: Tucson
Trader Rating: (8)
Posts: 2,007
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by srtdrew View Post
Am I the only one that really doesn't give two shits about the weight? I think that some of you just have to come to the realization that this car is based off a more upmarket/"luxury"(used very loosely) vehicle built for comfort and practicality. There was no existing sports coupe or chasis that would have made this car economically viable otherwise. Go and buy an elise or an exige if you want a light weight sports coupe(either of which costs more, by the way), not something whose drivetrain alone weighs more than those cars.

Personally, I will buy one for sheer looks alone and secondly performance once the 392 with a 6 speed hits in a couple years. That car will humble 99% of the cars out there when I want it to and look awesome doing it.

Sorry, don't like the fatty's. Reasonable weight would be 3800lbs or less although anything above 3700lbs would be too much if you ask me. If you're going for looks alone I guess that's cool, plus it should be a pretty rare car too. As far as performance goes, it's gonna be getting beat by cheaper Csrt-4s, MS3s, EVOs, STIs, Camaros (eventually), 135is, Mustangs, GTOs, etc.. ^^All those cars are lighter and have at least 4 seats.
enginjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 07:26 PM   #3958 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
Big Country's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Member Number: 19776
Location: Arnold, MO
Trader Rating: (7)
Posts: 926
Default

The SRT8 cars (300C & Charger) weigh in at 4160lbs and can run the 1/4 mile in in the low 13's, with some stock cars running high 12's with a good driver, good track and cool weather. I'm sure the Challenger will do the same. The SRT8 cars also surprise everybody with how well they handle for as big as they are. With a 4" shorter wheelbase, the Challenger should handle just a tad better than their SRT8 brothers.

Would it be nice to only weigh in at 3800lbs? Heck yes it would be, but it doesn't. However I think a lot of people are mistaken if they don't believe this car will be able to perform. It should only get better once the manual transmission gets put in the car in a year or so.
__________________
Old ride: 04 SRT-4. I miss that car
Current ride: 06 Charger R/T. JMB CAI, Kooks LT headers and Corsa exhaust.
Big Country is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 07:33 PM   #3959 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
xneonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Member Number: 39722
Location: OrangeCounty CA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 308
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by srtdrew View Post
Am I the only one that really doesn't give two shits about the weight? I think that some of you just have to come to the realization that this car is based off a more upmarket/"luxury"(used very loosely) vehicle built for comfort and practicality. There was no existing sports coupe or chasis that would have made this car economically viable otherwise. Go and buy an elise or an exige if you want a light weight sports coupe(either of which costs more, by the way), not something whose drivetrain alone weighs more than those cars.

Personally, I will buy one for sheer looks alone and secondly performance once the 392 with a 6 speed hits in a couple years. That car will humble 99% of the cars out there when I want it to and look awesome doing it.

i think you havent come to the realization that this performance oriented 2 door smaller then LX car should not weigh more than my boat-like 4 door family sedan charger r/t

Last edited by xneonx : 02-06-2008 at 10:33 PM.
xneonx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 10:34 PM   #3960 (permalink)
SRTforums Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Member Number: 17360
Location: Eastern PA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 111
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by xneonx View Post
i think you havent come to the realization that this performance oriented 2 door smaller then LX car should not weigh more than my boat-like 4 door family sedan charger r/t

Here I thought the whole point of my post was that I came to the realization that the car is heavy and can't seem to figure out why no one else can? You're right I guess, we should have just settled for a four door car that weighed a lot and was a disgrace to the name that it carries. Oh that's right, your signature shows that you bought one of those... oops
srtdrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Register Home Forum Photo Gallery Active Topics (D) Chat Mark Forums Read
  SRT Forums - SRT4, SRT6, SRT8, SRT10 & Dodge Forum > Site Functions > General Car Discussion




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Wheel & Tire Center

Sponsors

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:13 PM.

(C) SRTforums.com
Page generated in 0.24520 seconds with 14 queries

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0