Quote: Originally Posted by
torque222 
when he asked if you had any questions why did you say no? if you were in fact not guilty, you should have said something. take it to court and make him prove it, the judge is not gonna take "i saw a red blur" as a cause to right a speeding ticket without proof such as radar or laser. more than likely you can get it thrown out...or any good traffic lawyer will get you out of it..but why pay for something when you don't have to, this is just my opinion....good luck.......but if you are guilty "pay it"....................
I said "No sir", to not getting an argument or confrontation with him. He was being a bit smart with me since he pulled me over. If I sat there and asked him questions such as, "how do you know it was me"... "did you actually see my car"... "did you actually see me driving the car you supposely seen". Its more of me questioning the officer as to what he assumed and I didn't feel I needed to step on his shoes in anyway. If I was guilty I would just pay the ticket and take the course to remove the points. In which this case I'm not guilty. I've gotten speeding tickets in the past (6 yrs ago) and those I paid and didn't fight because I was in the wrong. I'm definately not in the wrong with this one.
Thank you for the suggestions and opinions
