Quote: Originally Posted by
wannasupra 
....my posts were mostly conjecture, you know, a guess. like, "the sct should be able to boost by gear, there's a provision for it in the toys pcm" that's not saying i know how to modify it to perform said action, merely expressing my personal view that with the data that's availible to me, i see no reason for this to be impossible.
Neil has a point, If you're not sure about something, but have an educated guess, then say it like that.
Instead of:
"if they didn't turn adaptive learning off in the pcm, it's trying to revert programming back to stock. could be part of the problem."
you should have said:
"maybe it has something to do with adaptive learning in the pcm, it's trying to revert programming back to stock. could be part of the problem. I really don't know,,just a thought."
It would benefit everyone, wannasupra, even yourself, if you didn't use such an absolute tone. Most kids, who don't know you, might think you know what you are talking about. Thats what got Neil all fired up. Just use more "maybe", "could be", "might", "possibly", "I think",,,
I try to always leave the posibilty that I could be wrong,, just look at my first few posts in this section. Over-confidence is a halmark of a closed mind.
