Go Back   SRT Forums - SRT4, SRT6, SRT8, SRT10 & Dodge Forum
Register Home Forum Photo Gallery Active Topics (D) Chat VBay [0] Mark Forums Read

       
SRTForums.com is the premier Dodge Neon SRT-4 on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!


View Single Post
Old 11-05-2007, 05:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
duster360
SRTforums Member
 
duster360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Member Number: 45182
Location: Central IL
Trader Rating: (11)
Posts: 2,197
WRONG INFO!!Injector Flow - Math/Info/Chart!STICKY

I went through the math in the Injector Sticky Speadsheet that equates the Mopar injectors to Aftermarket RC injectors and its WAY OFF!! Imo for a true comparison you need to equate the Mopar injectors so that the common CC/min to lb/hr conversion factor works as it does with the aftermarket injectors.

To get all the #s to out right and line up with the conversion factor, the actual density of the "RC test fluid" needs to be around 723Kg/m^3 not 760-770 as was reported. Now RC and others might use a bit heavier fluid to do in house flow test with, but if you take the mass flow rates listed by Bosch, Delphi, Siemens and Mopar, (which all btw use Heptane), and apply a new density to equal the common 10.5 conversion factor here is what you get:

"RC equivalent" cc/min 58psi
S0: 526
S1: 579
S2/3: 684
550: 637
650: 753
750: 868
850: 984

Here's how I came up with it.
Mopar using N-Heptane 685Kg/m^3
S0=527cc/min * 60min/hr * (1m/100cm)^3 * 685kg/m^3 *2.2lb/kg = 47.4lb/hr--Equates to Sticky's results
S1=577cc/min * 60min/hr * (1m/100cm)^3 * 685kg/m^3 *2.2lb/kg = 52.2lb/hr--Equates to Sticky's results
S2= 682cc/min * 60min/hr * (1m/100cm)^3 * 685kg/m^3 *2.2lb/kg = 61.7lb/hr
RC but with a different "fluid"
751cc/min(650cc@58psi) * 60min/hr * (1m/100cm)^3 * 723kg/m^3 *2.2lb/kg = 71.7lb

To make sure I had the equation right I divided 751cc/min by 10.5 to hopefully get a mass flow in lb/hr,,, and I got 71.5lb/hr Looks good

So now I recalced the Mopar S2 but swapped in the 723kg/m^3
682cc/min * 60min/hr * (1m/100cm)^3 * 723kg/m^3 *2.2lb/kg = 65.1lb/hr
This lb/hr mass flow divided by the same 10.5 aftermarket conversion gets you 684cc/min and NOT the 761cc/min as listed in the sticky! Quite a bit of difference
__________________
Quote: Originally Posted by Bell Intercoolers
Regardless of the [Thermal] efficiency, if too much pressure is lost, then the intercooler is either useless or can actually decrease performance...Corky Bell


Last edited by duster360 : 03-20-2008 at 01:02 PM.
duster360 is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
 
Google Links

» Wheel & Tire Center

Sponsors

Sponsors

» Auto Resources
Get Dodge reviews on Dodge trucks and cars such as a Dodge Charger and others. Find new Dodge cars at local new Dodge Dealer.
» Sponsor Links
»Garage Storage and Cabinets
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:43 PM.

(C) SRTforums.com
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.

Page generated in 0.12904 seconds with 12 queries